Close
Close
Browser Compatibility Notification
It appears you are trying to access this site using an outdated browser. As a result, parts of the site may not function properly for you. We recommend updating your browser to its most recent version at your earliest convenience.
Canadian Consortium for Gambling Research Logo
Contact Us Main menu icon
HomeFeedback
  • About CCGR
  • Events
  • Projects
  • Contact Us
  • Canadian Problem Gambling Index
  • Gambling Participation Instrument
  • Canadian Adolescent Gambling Inventory
  • Social and Economic Impact of Gambling
  • Low Risk Gambling Guidelines

Canadian Problem Gambling Index

Show or hide navigation More
Decrease text size Default text size Increase text size
Print This Page
Share This Page
  • Open new window to share this page via Facebook Facebook
  • Open new window to share this page via LinkedIn LinkedIn
  • Open new window to share this page via Twitter Twitter
  • Email This page Email
Home/Projects/Canadian Problem Gambling Index

More in this Section...

Related Documents

  • Document1

Contact Us

Projects

Research leads to PGSI scoring changes

The CPGI's Problem Gambling Severity Index scoring cut-off rules have been modified for the low-risk and moderate-risk subtypes. Researchers are encouraged to adopt the new scoring system, with PGSI scores of one to four (1-4) indicating low-risk gambling, and scores of five to seven (5-7) indicating moderate-risk gambling. Please click on the 2010 report on the right to read more about this scoring modification.

Developing the CPGI

The CPGI was launched in 2001 as the first project of the collaborating group of funders that has now become the CCGR. Since its launch, the CPGI has become internationally recognized as a robust measure of gambling behaviour. The CPGI includes the nin-item Problem Gambling Severity Index, which has been used extensively across Canada and in Australia, Great Britain, Iceland and Norway to measure the prevalence of problem gambling.

  • RESEARCH TEAM: Jackie Ferris and Harold Wynne
  • STATUS: Complete (2001)

Evaluating the CPGI's performance

As a result of its widespread use, researchers gained significant experience and insight in the use of the CPGI. In 2006, the CCGR funded a study to capture this experience and make recommendations for the further development and enhancement of the CPGI. To complement these findings, the CCGR then funded a 2007 review that examined critiques of the CPGI and secondary analyses emanating from existing surveys. Combined, these projects led to a plan for a series of prioritized CPGI enhancement initiatives to ensure the CPGI remains a state-of-the-art instrument for conducting population surveys on the nature, extent and consequences of problem gambling among adults.

  • RESEARCH TEAM: John McCready and Edward Adlaf
  • STATUS: Complete (2006)

Refining the CPGI

In 2009, the CCGR began funding this series of prioritized research initiatives, all of which were overseen by an expert advisory panel to ensure rigorous scientific methodology throughout the enhancement process. The expert advisory panel included Norbert Schmitz (McGill University), Sherry Stewart (Dalhousie University), and Joël Tremblay (Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières).

PROJECT: Improving the Psychometric Properties of the Problem Gambling Severity Index

  • RESEARCH TEAM: Shawn Currie, David Casey and David Hodgins
  • STATUS: Complete (2010)

The first initiative, an analysis of the CPGI's psychometric properties and the cut-off points for gambling risk levels, was completed in 2010. The project analyzed the performance of the CPGI's Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI) in three large population datasets and examined the viability of alternative scoring and weighting schemes. Results show that two of the PGSI's subtypes - the non-problem and problem gambling subtypes - represent distinct and well-defined groups, but that the original classification of low-risk and moderate-risk subtypes fits less well. As a result, the PGSI scoring cut-off rules were modified for the low-risk and moderate-risk subtypes. The CCGR encourages researchers to report all four subtypes separately, as they represent meaningfully different groups of gamblers.

PROJECT: Developing a CPGI Population Harm Supplement

  • RESEARCH TEAM: Michael Bagby, Lena Quilty and Chris Watson
  • STATUS: Complete (2011)

The second initiative consisted of the development of new CPGI items to more broadly assess the harm associated with gambling in survey populations.

Project Resources

Title Link to Resource
Problem Gambling Severity Index
(October 2015)
View Resource
CPGI Population Harm French Translation
(February 2012)
View Resource
CPGI Population Harm English
(February 2012)
View Resource
Improving the Psychometric Properties of the Problem Gambling Severity Index
(November 2010)
View Resource
Rendement et bonification de l'Indice canadien du jeu excessif (ICJE) - Rapport et recommandations - Français
(September 2006)
View Resource
Performance and Enhancement of the Canadian Problem Gambling Index (CPGI) - Report and Recommendations
(September 2006)
View Resource
CPGI Final Report - English
(February 2001)
View Resource
ICJE Rapport final - Français
(February 2001)
View Resource

 

© 2017 Canadian Consortium for Gambling Research

Designed by eSolutions
  • About CCGR
  • Events
  • Projects
  • Contact Us